• Skip to main content

March for Life

  • National March
    • 2026 March for Life
    • 2026 Speakers
    • “Life is a Gift”
    • Hotel & Travel Information
    • Events
    • Sponsorships
    • 2025 March for Life
      • 2025 Theme
      • 2025 Speakers
      • 2025 Livestream
      • 2025 March Highlights
  • State Marches
    • Find Your State
    • Alaska
    • Arizona
    • California
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Georgia
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Maryland
    • Michigan
    • Montana
    • New Hampshire
    • New Jersey
    • North Dakota
    • Ohio
    • Oklahoma
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Virginia
  • Pregnancy Help Donation Drive
  • News
    • BLOG
    • PRESS RELEASES
    • IN THE NEWS
  • Education
    • Post-Roe America
    • Dobbs SCOTUS Case
  • About us
    • MISSION
    • Our Team
    • Our President
    • Impact
    • FAQs
    • Jobs
    • Internships
    • CONTACT US
  • Store
  • TAKE ACTION
  • DONATE

Nothing About Abortion is Luxurious

April 6, 2015 By Jeanne Mancini Leave a Comment

Nothing About Abortion is Luxurious

 

Recently, the Washington Post featured Carafem, a new abortion-pill facility in Montgomery County, Maryland, the suburbs of Washington, D.C.

With its natural wood floors and plush upholstery, Carafem aims to feel more like a spa than a medical clinic. But the slick ads set to go up in Metro stations across the Washington region leave nothing to doubt: “Abortion. Yeah, we do that.”

As a person who regularly comes into contact with women and men who deeply regret their abortions, I was saddened to read about DC’s newest business, a “luxury spa” chemical-abortion clinic in “Yes, they do abortions.”  The flippant nature in which this clinic is approaching a deeply personal and unnatural procedure is unsettling and misleading.  In the interest of informed consent, the clinic should let the women know that a chemical abortion is even more difficult on women than surgical abortions, physically and psychologically, according to peer-reviewed academic research.

I’ll never forget the conversation I had with the father of a 18 year-old beautiful young woman, Holly, who died as a result of a chemical abortion that was legally administered in a clinic.  Americans are increasingly pro-life not because of a bad marketing strategy by the abortion industry, but because of the inherently destructive “product” being sold.  An abortion is the furthest thing from a spa treatment as can be imagined.

** For information about the abortion bill reversal, click HERE.

Filed Under: Blog

March 23, 2015 By Scott Zipperle 1 Comment

How Obamacare Decimated Bipartisan Pro-Life Support

 

It’s hard to believe it’s been five years since the passage of the President’s health care plan! While many experts will write on how the health care law is hurting the economy, families, the unborn, medical device manufacturers, businesses, the elderly, etc. etc. I’d rather turn my attention to a victim not many are talking about: pro-life bi-partisanship on the federal level.

MarchForLife_Obamacare5years_Meme copyHistorically the Democratic Party has been pro-abortion since the Carter Administration and became even more so in response to the strong pro-life views of President Ronald Reagan.  Despite this fealty to abortion pro-life views were tolerated in the Democratic Party, in part due to their large Catholic constituency.  This tolerance was limited of course.  If you wanted to run for higher office you needed to renounce your pro-life views (believe it or not at one time Jesse Jackson and Senators Al Gore and Joe Biden were pro-life, until they decided to run for President).

Further evidence of this limited tolerance was one of the strongest pro-life Governors of the 1980s and 1990s was a Democrat, Pennsylvania Governor Bob Casey.  Governor Casey was best known for challenging his Party to be more tolerant of pro-life views and also in legally advocating for the unborn in  Planned Parenthood v. Casey, a major Supreme Court case that upheld almost all the prohibitions on abortion that Governor Casey had signed into law.  Despite this (or more likely because of this) the popular governor was barred repeatedly from speaking at Democratic Party conventions.  Around this same time a newly elected President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary were expertly putting up smoke screens on the issue of abortion – arguing that it should be “safe, legal and rare” while implementing policies that solidified pro-abortion policies within the federal government. The Clintons increased  ties between the Democratic Party and radical pro-abortion groups like NARAL and Planned Parenthood, including increasing taxpayer funds to such groups who in turn increased campaign donations to Democrats.

This smoke screen approach to hide radical pro-abortion policies became the norm for some Democrats such as Rep. Tim Ryan (D-Ohio) and, the future President Barack Obama..  However a number of strong pro-life Democrats also emerged such as Reps. Bart Stupak (R-Mich.), Mike McIntyre (D-NC), Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.), Colin Peterson (D-Minn.), Kathy Dahlkemper (D-Penn.) Nick Rahall (D-WV), Alan Mollohan (D-WV) Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.) and Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Nebr.).

Along comes the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), “Obamacare” introduced as a bill in November, 2009, and passed in March, 2010. The bill rolled back decades of abortion policy, allowing taxpayer subsidies for policies with elective abortion under a system of accounting gimmicks, and charging an “abortion surcharge” for anyone enrolled in a federally subsidized health care plan that covers elective abortions – regardless of if the enrollee agrees with the policy or not.

As passed five years ago today Obamacare also lacks comprehensive abortion funding restrictions, instead relying on a powerless Executive Order that reiterates the very accounting gimmicks that allow for taxpayer funding of abortions. Legal precedent has shown that Executive Orders cannot trump the law. Additionally Obamacare created slush funds for pro-abortion groups; opened the door for President Obama’s mandate that forces people (regardless of their views on abortion) to pay for abortifacients and also uses taxpayer funds to pay for abortions in health care plans for federal employees.

Prior to the vote on  Obamacare the Democrats listed above were reliable on standing up for pro-life principles, but following  the vote only Reps. McIntyre, Lipinski and Peterson remained loyal to the pro-life cause.As of November 2014 only Dan Lipinski remains in Congress.

During the passage of Obamacare the betrayal of Rep. Bart Stupak is well known.  Long a champion for adding pro-life protections into the health care legislation he folded under pressure from the White House and pro-abortion groups (closely tied financially to each other) to accept a health care law with no pro-life protections other than a smoke screen scheme devised by once pro-life Senator Ben Nelson.

Not well known during the Obamacare debate is that pro-life Republicans faced a challenge to their pro-life views during the Obamacare debate as well.  Prior to the first vote in the House on that chamber’s draft of health care legislation a group of fiscally conservative minded folks sought to use the pro-life movement as a political tool against the health care law.  On the day of the debate representatives from a fiscal conservative group started falsely telling Republicans that pro-life groups, including the one I worked for at the time, wanted to sink the amendment that would have put pro-life protections into the health care law, also known as the Stupak Amendment.  Luckily we were able to set the record straight that day – knowing that the result of Republicans voting against a clearly pro-life amendment would have divided the pro-life movement and cause pro-life Democrats to rightly no longer trust Republicans on the issue of the protecting the unborn.  Instead pro-life Republicans voted on principle for the pro-life amendment, which in turn gave anti-Obamacare forces months more to prepare grassroots for the continuing fight.

Ironically it was Rep. Stupak’s later voting against a similar version of his own amendment that sealed his betrayal of pro-life principles and allowed for the passage of the pro-abortion Obamacare legislation.

That betrayal was not the end of the devastation though.  In the election following the passage of Obamacare many of the Democrats who were once pro-life yet voted for Obamacare lost their elections.  These losses, in large part, were brought about by the work of the Susan B. Anthony List.  One now former congressional member, Rep. Steve Driehaus (D-Ohio) attempted to sue SBA List for being the cause of his loss of employment.  In his attempt he was aided by the group Democrats for Life (who also supported the final pro-abortion version of Obamacare) who reportedly revealed private e-mail exchanges to help target pro-life individuals, including myself.  These actions still taint the once proud organization today and make it untrustworthy in the eyes of many in the pro-life movement.

Obamacare changed the face of Congress in many ways, and not just with the defeat of once pro-life Democrats.  As Family Research Council recently pointed out, Catholics, seen as a strong force among pro-lifers, are also taking a second look at their traditional support for Democrats:

Catholics are bolting from the Democratic Party so rapidly that Pew Research Center now says 53% of white Catholics now favor the GOP (compared to the Democrats’ 39%), the “largest point spread in the history of the Pew poll.” And the evidence is sitting in Congress. When President Obama was swept into office, there were 98 Catholic Democrats in the House and 37 Catholic Republicans. Barely six years later, there are two times as many Catholic Republicans in the House (69) and 68 Democrats.

To end on a more positive note, while it is true the Democratic Party on the federal level suffered, there is clear sign of a resurgence of pro-life Democrats on the local levels.  The numerous pieces of pro-life legislation flooding the states are being done with bi-partisan support.  In addition some Senate Democrats are becoming more emboldened in a Senate led by pro-life Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) as opposed to the pro-abortion former Majority Leader (and former pro-life Democrat) Harry Reid (D-Nev.).  Self-avowed pro-life Democrats such as Joe Manchin (D-WV) and even Bob Casey (D-Penn.) (son of the aforementioned Governor who voted for the pro-abortion version of Obamacare) are currently stepping up to the plate to defend barring of taxpayer funds in the human trafficking bill.  All of this is a good thing – pro-life policies should not be a partisan issue.  Abortion kills regardless of political party.

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: Obamacare

March 18, 2015 By Scott Zipperle Leave a Comment

Gosnell’s ‘House of Horrors’

 

Two years ago today, on March 18, 2013, the murder trial of Philadelphia abortionist Kermit Gosnell began.  Opening statements were given, in which the prosecutor, the Assistant District Attorney, called Gosnell’s operation a “house of horrors.”

>>> Who is Gosnell?

As a reminder, the Grand Jury Report, filed in 2011, opened with this statement:

This case is about a doctor who killed babies and endangered women.  What we mean is that he regularly and illegally delivered live, viable, babies in the third trimester of pregnancy – and then murdered these newborns by severing their spinal cords with scissors.  The medical practice by which he carried out this business was a filthy fraud in which he overdosed his patients with dangerous drugs, spread venereal disease among them with infected instruments, perforated their wombs and bowels – and, on at least two occasions, caused their deaths.  Over the years, many people came to know that something was going on here.  But no one put a stop to it.

Although, Gosnell went on to be convicted, the truth is that innocent preborn babies still die every day in abortion facilities across the country.

Gosnell

>>> Gosnell: Not An Isolated Incident

Filmmakers Ann and Phelim McAleer are in the process of making a movie about Gosnell and the media cover-up. You can support their historic crowd-funding effort to produce this important film.

>>> Making Gosnell A Household Name

The movie will be out in 2016, but in the meantime, please share the above image to remind the world that what happens in every abortion facility equates to a ‘house of horrors.’  Let’s never forget that until each one is out of business!

Filed Under: Blog

March 17, 2015 By Scott Zipperle 1 Comment

Give Life March: Day in the Life of Carissa Carroll

For our March Give Life Challenge –> participating in World Down Syndrome Day on March 21 <– we hosted Carissa Carroll as our Instagram Guest!  Carissa is mom to two precious boys, including Jack who has Down Syndrome. Jack’s Baskets celebrate every child born with Down syndrome and congratulate their family with gifts, support, and resources.  See what her day was like below, which included delivering one of “Jack’s Baskets” to a family with a newborn with Down Syndrome.

 You can also read more about the Carroll family’s story here in the Twin Cities Pioneer Press –>“Twin Cities family hopes Jack’s Basket eases Down syndrome diagnosis.”

Filed Under: Blog

March 9, 2015 By Scott Zipperle Leave a Comment

Down Syndrome Briefing: Every Life is a Gift

On October 23, 2015 we announced the 2015 March for Life theme: Every Life is a Gift. With this emphasis, we hope to shed light on the sad fact that a disproportionately large number of pre-born babies given a “poor prenatal diagnosis” are targeted for abortion.

Filed Under: Education

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 127
  • Page 128
  • Page 129
  • Page 130
  • Page 131
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 185
  • Go to Next Page »
#WHYWEMARCH
| Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | ©2026 March For Life
DESIGNED BY FUZATI