• Skip to main content

March for Life

  • National March
    • 2026 March for Life
    • 2026 Speakers
    • “Life is a Gift”
    • Hotel & Travel Information
    • Events
    • Sponsorships
  • State Marches
    • Find Your State
    • Alaska
    • Arizona
    • California
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Georgia
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Maryland
    • Michigan
    • Montana
    • New Hampshire
    • New Jersey
    • North Dakota
    • Ohio
    • Oklahoma
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Virginia
  • Pregnancy Help Donation Drive
  • News
    • BLOG
    • PRESS RELEASES
    • IN THE NEWS
  • Education
    • Post-Roe America
    • Dobbs SCOTUS Case
  • About us
    • MISSION
    • Our Team
    • Our President
    • Impact
    • FAQs
    • Jobs
    • Internships
    • CONTACT US
  • Store
  • TAKE ACTION
  • DONATE

In the News

March 31, 2026 By March for Life

GUEST OPINION: When ordinary people choose courage over silence, lives are saved

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this guest post are solely those of the author.

(Live Action) — Younger Americans are quietly rethinking abortion – even in Connecticut, one of the most abortion-permissive states in the nation. On March 18th, hundreds of Connecticut residents marched through the streets of Hartford to say so out loud.

Hartford is the city where I, Christina, was scheduled to be aborted. On March 18th, I walked those same streets as a wife, a mother, a minister, and a pro-life advocate. Every step I took was made possible by a decision my mother made decades ago, and by the words of a stranger who gave her the courage to make it.

My mother, Andrea, was sitting in the hallway of Mount Sinai Hospital, wearing a hospital gown, tears in her eyes, when an elderly African-American janitor approached her. “Do you want to have this baby?” the woman asked, her eyes full of compassion. “Yes,” my mother replied. That question was enough.

When the abortionist called her into his office, she told him she wanted to keep her baby. His expression was cold as he forcefully attempted to persuade her to stay.

“You’ve already paid for this,” he said. “You’re just nervous. Don’t leave this room.”

She walked out.

She held the secret of that appointment for over 20 years. I learned about it while attending Southern Connecticut State University – and it changed the course of my life.

I began talking to women across Connecticut and heard story after story: coercion by partners, pressure from medical professionals, a lack of resources and support. That knowledge led me to work as a Client Services Manager at a pregnancy resource center, and eventually to adopt through Connecticut’s Foster to Adopt program.

My mother’s courage gave me my life, and breathed life into my own beautiful family. Her story is what compels me to march.

The mainstream assumption is that younger generations are uniformly pro-choice. However, a generation that grew up with ultrasound images of their siblings in the womb is arriving at its own conclusions.

I, Tierin-Rose, grew up in a home where life was always cherished. Since I was six, my family opened our home to foster siblings. With seven siblings and now 22 nieces and nephews, including several adopted children, every life has always been treated as a gift.

My own personal convictions about the value of life were solidified the first time I heard and understood my older sister’s story. She became a mom when she was just a teenager, and faced a world in which it was uncommon for someone in her situation to do anything other than end the life of her child. But she chose a different path – and now her child is not only a beloved member of my family, but also one of my closest friends.

My sister shared her story at last year’s Connecticut March for Life, and now she serves on the board of a pregnancy resource center – the same center that performed her ultrasound when she was a teenager. Her witness helped me and many others to understand how much a woman’s choice depends on whether she feels seen, supported, and loved.

As young women who grew up in Connecticut, we didn’t simply inherit a political position – we arrived at it, through our own lives, and the witnesses of those alongside us who call Connecticut home. ​​We stand in solidarity with our neighbors who oppose Governor Lamont’s recent decision to give $10 million in government funds to Planned Parenthood. These emergency funds are meant to serve as a lifeline for the most vulnerable people in our state – not a well-funded organization that does not reflect our values.

The janitor who saved Christina’s life wasn’t a politician or an activist, but an ordinary person who decided to say something. That’s who we witnessed at the Connecticut March for Life – ordinary people deciding to say something. Because of her, a life was saved, a family was formed, and a story that now reaches thousands began.

That is exactly what the Connecticut March for Life this year was all about: ordinary people choosing courage over silence.


(Originally published by Live Action)

Filed Under: In the News

March 19, 2026 By March for Life

March for Life in Atlanta was just the beginning. Join our growing movement.

(The Atlanta Journal-Constitution) — On March 12, an interfaith and intergenerational coalition of Georgians gathered in Atlanta for the Georgia March for Life.

I, Kelbie Milon, was honored to be speak at the rally about the work we do at the Refuge Center to support women. When I was asked to speak, I didn’t hesitate because the women who walk through my doors every day are exactly who the march is for.

When I stepped onto that stage, I spoke to a cross section of our state united by a common goal: ensuring that those who are weakest and most vulnerable receive excellent care, love and support. That is a message that should appeal across partisan divides.

I, Hayden Sledge, was born here in Georgia and share this conviction. Those who support women and babies in this state are not a political faction, but good people who believe in the beauty and goodness of every life. Georgians of all stripes have always held these values.

The conversation about abortion has been loud, especially since the U.S. Supreme Court decision on Dobbs, now four years ago. But historically, the majority of Georgians have favored common-sense limits on abortion — and the next generation is moving in the same direction.

Pro-life identification among adults ages 18-29 has climbed 11 points since Dobbs, according to Gallup and related surveys. Something is shifting, and Georgia is leading that shift.

But there is still a lot of work to do. Our state’s heartbeat law, enacted by the elected representatives of the people of Georgia in 2019, has been subject to unnecessary litigation since it passed, leaving families, physicians and women in limbo.

Meanwhile, chemical abortion pills are being ordered online and self-administered without medical supervision — with devastating consequences.

Two of those consequences have names: Amber Thurman, 28, and Candi Miller, 41.

If you’re a Georgian you already know their stories, as when they were first uncovered it shook our state — and the whole nation.

These Georgia women took chemical abortion pills and both developed complications resulting in their tragic deaths in 2022, not to mention the deaths of their unborn children.

According to the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, chemical abortions by pill have a complication rate nearly four times that of a standard surgical abortion — a fact the big abortion industry has long downplayed

These women may have been told that abortion pills were safe, but instead, they both lost their lives.

We should all be able to agree these women should have been informed about the real dangers of these drugs, and that they and their families were done an unconscionable disservice, regardless of where we stand on abortion.

I, Kelbie, know what it means to need real answers. When I was 30, I walked through the doors of the Refuge Center as a client, seeking pregnancy confirmation and support. The compassion I received left a lasting impression.

I later returned as a volunteer, then as staff, and have served as executive director since last year. What was once the place that supported me is now the place where I have the privilege of supporting others.

What I’ve learned through my work is this: Pregnant women need clear information, compassionate care and a community willing to walk alongside them.

In 2025 alone, the Refuge Center served nearly 1,000 clients — all free of charge — through pregnancy testing, ultrasounds, options counseling, parenting classes, material support and programs for new fathers. We are staffed by licensed medical professionals.

We’ve served Georgians for nearly five decades. We are not a “fake clinic.”

We are a lifeline.

We are proud that Georgia is a leader when it comes to serving women and families, no matter their circumstances, but we can always do more.

This means continuing to lead by doing our part on the state level to protect women from the well-documented dangers of unregulated chemical abortion pills, according to the Charlotte Lozier Institute, which advises and leads the pro-life movement with groundbreaking scientific, statistical and medical research.

This means ensuring that pregnancy resource centers are advertised, funded and accessible to every woman who needs them (a recent update in the state’s budget increase in government funding of these centers by 10% is proof that Georgia is leading the way).


(Originally published by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution)

Filed Under: In the News

February 27, 2026 By March for Life

Pregnancy centers serve women. Smearing them causes real harm. | Opinion

I’ve visited pregnancy centers across the country. The women I met there deserve better than baseless smears.

(IndyStar) — The recent controversy at the University of Notre Dame surrounding the promotion of a vocal abortion advocate to a leadership role seems to have run its immediate course, with the announcement that Professor Susan Ostermann has declined the appointment to lead the University’s Liu Institute for Asia and Asian Studies.

But the claims that gave rise to the controversy remain very much a live issue and bear further discussion.

As a proud graduate of the University of Notre Dame and president of March for Life, I’m grateful for the way my alma mater formed both my intellect and my conscience. Notre Dame taught me that truth matters, that human dignity is not negotiable and that where we see an injustice being done, we should work to right it.

It is in the spirit of what I learned at Notre Dame that I must address one element of the recent controversy at the university: Ostermann’s repeated public claims about pregnancy resource centers, which cannot be permitted to stand — especially with the name of Our Lady’s University attached to them. Her allegations are inflammatory, unsupported, and deeply irresponsible.

In a May 2024 Chicago Tribune commentary, Ostermann and her co-authors described pregnancy resource centers as “anti-abortion rights propaganda sites” that “provide false information to women who are lured to them believing they will receive legitimate medical care.” In an earlier piece, she asserted that PRCs are “specifically designed to deceive pregnant people,” calling their work “coercive.”

These are serious claims. They are also wrong.

Across the U.S., more than 2,700 PRCs provide essential care to women. Most are nonprofit organizations staffed by a combination of licensed medical professionals and trained volunteers.

According to data released in 2025 by the Charlotte Lozier Institute, the research arm of Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, PRCs nationwide provided more than $350 million in free medical services, material assistance and support to over one million clients in a single year. That included millions of diapers, baby formula and clothing items; hundreds of thousands of free ultrasounds; STI testing; parenting classes; housing referrals; and ongoing case management.

Here in Indiana, over a dozen locations of the outstanding Women’s Care Center as well as many other PRCs serve women across the state.

These services are offered at no cost to women, regardless of their income, background or ultimate decision. They are not billed to Medicaid or private insurance. These organizations are not profit-making enterprises. They are a community response to women facing unexpected or difficult pregnancies. And they exist precisely because many women want practical support in carrying a pregnancy to term. There is great demand for the support and resources that PRCs provide.

To dismiss these institutions that serve women in need as “propaganda sites” is not only inaccurate; it is demeaning to the women who seek them out.

It is also dangerous.

In the months following the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision, more than 100 pregnancy resource centers and pro-life organizations were attacked. In some cases, facilities were burned to the ground.

Words matter. When respected academics repeatedly characterize PRCs as fraudulent, coercive and harmful, it feeds a narrative that these organizations are illegitimate and even deserving of hostility. No one is responsible for the criminal actions of others, but people who wade into the public square bear responsibility for the climate they help create.

I have visited PRCs across our nation. I have seen firsthand the essential care they provide. I have met women whose lives have been transformed by the services and support they received at PRCs. In addition to providing practical, tangible support, PRCs offer a vital but less visible service: restoring women’s dignity and confidence by treating them with respect and affirming their capacity to be mothers.

PRCs are not the caricature Ostermann describes. They are an expression of civil society at its best and, more than any other type of organization, they prepare pregnant women to make a free and unfettered choice. Not every woman who walks into a PRC ultimately chooses to carry her pregnancy to term, but every single one is treated with dignity and respect.

We cannot let the resolution of Ostermann’s leadership appointment at Notre Dame be the final word in the underlying debate in which she has repeatedly engaged, as she is unfortunately just one of many who make incorrect and baseless claims against PRCs. The ideologically driven witch hunts continue as a New Jersey pregnancy center at the center of a current U.S. Supreme Court case faces threats to its First Amendment rights, and just days ago a federal judge sided with state officials in Massachusetts who are running smear campaigns against a PRC there.

None of this is merited, none of it is fact-based and all of it damages the common good by making it more difficult for women who want and need pregnancy support to find it. PRCs, and the countless women who have been helped by them, deserve better than these baseless smears.

Jennie Bradley Lichter is president of March for Life, a former deputy director of the White House Domestic Policy Council in the first Trump administration and a graduate of the University of Notre Dame.


(Originally published by IndyStar)

Filed Under: In the News

January 26, 2026 By March for Life

March for Life Grows Younger and More Committed

(Newsmax) — As Washington, D.C., braced for a major storm and a possible shutdown Friday, thousands of abortion opponents from across the U.S. arrived in the nation’s capital for the 53rd annual March for Life.

In a trend that has emerged since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022 and returned authority over abortion to the states, participants are increasingly younger and more vocally opposed to abortion.

“Dobbs [the decision which overturned Roe] didn’t go far enough,” said Charlie Leighton, one of a contingent of high school students from St. Francis Xavier Church College in St. Louis, Missouri. “The next great step would be a federal ban on abortion.”

Leighton conceded that “this may not be politically viable now, but I hope that will change.” He added that larger Marches for Life could help generate broader support for a federal abortion ban.

Fellow Xavier student Nick Johnson, who is Black and attending his first March for Life, described himself to Newsmax as a “convert” to the pro-life cause and said he wanted very much “to be a voice for all races” in ending abortion.

“I was raised by a single mom who never married and could have aborted me but didn’t,” Johnson said. He also said he admired President Donald Trump’s “attitude on the abortion issue and his boldness in speaking out against abortion. He does say things sometimes that aren’t appropriate but on the abortion issue, he’s made a good start.”

Trump later spoke to marchers from the White House and promised to be a “voice for the voiceless” in the fight to end abortions.

Joseph DeProuyear, one of a group of 20-25 seminarians (students for the Roman Catholic priesthood) from St. Joseph’s Church in Yonkers, said “We’ve seen a lot of progress on the issue of abortion, such as overturning Roe with Dobbs and getting the issue back to the states. And some states such as Missouri have moved advanced pro-life laws.”

But, he quickly noted, “New York is still very pro-abortion. And that’s the reason we have to give more testimony to state legislators on why abortion should be stopped and continue to hold marches like this in individual states.”

While the March for Life has traditionally attracted large numbers of Roman Catholic participants, a growing number of non-Catholics continue to brave the Washington, D.C., cold to participate in the annual trek from a downtown rally to the Supreme Court.

One of them was Christina Hadgimallis of Southampton, Pennsylvania, a member of St. Mark’s Eastern Orthodox Church in nearby Newtown.

Noting that she is a mother of four and a chaperone for her daughter and her high school classmates, Hadgimallis said, “Speaking as an Orthodox Christian, in our church I don’t see as much of a push for pro-life activism, per se. [But] I’m very passionate about it. I wasn’t always, but I really am [now].”

As to just what made Hadgimallis passionate about the issue, she said “I’m not sure who explained it to me first. If it was [the late] Charlie Kirk or [educator] Michael Knowles, they explained life the way I could understand it from the womb all the way out. I have to say, when I was [her children’s] age, I could probably move more pro choice.

“But then, having my own children and losing children, I thought it’s an important movement. And I think it’s taking off with young people. This my first time here. I think it’s inspiring, and I want to set a good example for [my] girls.”


(Originally published by the Newsmax)

Filed Under: In the News

January 26, 2026 By March for Life

All Eyes on Trump, Congress as Americans March for Life

(Daily Signal) — On Friday, tens of thousands of Americans once again gathered for the 53rd annual March for Life in the District of Columbia. This year’s theme, “Life is a Gift,” points to the heart of why people young and old, from all walks of life and across the political spectrum, brave the cold every year.

Until every human being is protected and cherished from the moment of conception, happy warriors will continue to come together to celebrate wins, strengthen resolve, and demand for Congress and those who influence our culture to do more to protect women, girls, and unborn children.

On the policy front, both the Trump administration and Congress have been working to roll back President Joe Biden’s pro-abortion policies and advance additional pro-life protections.

Earlier in January, the administration announced:

—The Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights put Illinois on notice for a state policy requiring medical providers to provide abortion referrals. Such laws violate federal conscience protection laws. If Illinois doesn’t follow the law, HHS can withhold millions in federal funding.

—The administration is further expanding the Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance policy, which was reinstated last year. Nongovernmental organizations today receive global health assistance funding to certify that they won’t perform or promote abortion. Now, that policy will also apply to radical gender ideology and DEI policies as well.

—The National Institutes of Health is reinstating a policy requiring no federal funding to go to entities conducting unethical research on obsolete fetal tissue obtained from elective abortion. NIH will prioritize ethical alternatives instead.

—As reported exclusively by The Daily Signal, the Small Business Administration “is reviewing whether Planned Parenthood affiliates illegally received $88 million in loans during the COVID-19 pandemic.”

—HHS confirmed it will reverse a Biden-era regulation that allowed “taxpayer-funded abortion travel for unaccompanied illegal alien children.”

—The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services put Maryland on notice that its “abortion grant program violate[s] the protections against federal funding of abortions.”

—These announcements build on actions taken at the start of President Donald Trump’s second term, including:

—Pardoning 23 pro-life activists who had been convicted after the Justice Department under Biden weaponized the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act against them for peacefully protesting at abortion clinics.

—Issuing an executive order to disentangle taxpayers from abortion funding and revoking two pro-abortion executive orders issued by Biden.

—Reinstating the Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance Policy, which requires nongovernmental organizations to certify they won’t perform or promote abortion as a condition of receiving U.S. dollars.

—Defunding the United Nations Population Fund over its complicity in China’s coercive and inhumane population control policies.

—Renewing membership in the Geneva Consensus Declaration, a partnership of more than two dozen countries united in the goal of improving women’s health, preserving human life, strengthening the family, and protecting national sovereignty.

—Taking steps to ensure the Title X program grantees comply with the letter and spirit of federal law. The administration paused funding to certain grantees, like Planned Parenthood, to review compliance with grant terms and executive orders. And it restored funding to pro-life states, like Oklahoma and Tennessee, after the Biden administration improperly conditioned grants on abortion counseling requirements.

—Rescinding pro-abortion guidance and policies such as the Department of Defense abortion travel policy allowance as well as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidance that wrongly claimed federal law on emergency medical care requires that doctors perform elective abortions.

—Rescinding a Biden administration regulation requiring abortion benefits and abortion counseling for veterans and certain beneficiaries.

Congress, for its part, delivered a massive win by defunding Planned Parenthood of Medicaid payments for one year, thanks to a provision in 2025’s “One Big, Beautiful Bill.” The abortion giant receives over half a billion dollars courtesy of American taxpayers every year, and most of that is from Medicaid. Cutting off those reimbursements for a year has left Planned Parenthood reeling. About 50 clinics have closed in the past year.

Looking ahead, there’s still a lot of work to do.

In addressing health care reform, Congress must deliver on its commitment to protect innocent life by not expanding or entrenching taxpayer funding for abortion coverage. While Congress can be flexible on which road to take on health care reform, all of them must lead to a destination that protects innocent unborn life.

Congress must remain committed to preserving the Hyde family of amendments—which prohibit taxpayer dollars from being spent on elective abortions—in annual appropriations legislation. First enacted in 1976, Hyde will mark its 50th birthday later this year, assuming members hold the line. Importantly, thanks to Hyde, 2.6 million Americans get to celebrate their birthday every year, too.

Federal lawmakers must also work to defund Planned Parenthood beyond the one-year provision of the One Big, Beautiful Bill. Otherwise, the bulk of its taxpayer funding will resume on July 4. On the day Americans mark our nation’s 250th anniversary, it would be a tragedy to simultaneously gift Big Abortion with a massive payday.

There’s plenty of additional action for the administration to take as well. There are still regulations and administrative policies from Trump’s first term that haven’t been revived yet. There are also new challenges that have become more pronounced in recent years.

Addressing dangerous abortion drugs must be a top priority because women, girls, and unborn children’s lives are at stake. These pills are corrupting medicine by destroying any semblance of a doctor-patient relationship. They hurt women who are coerced or forced into an abortion they didn’t want. And they are stifling otherwise strong efforts pro-life states have made to protect life following the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision.

It’s, of course, encouraging that the Food and Drug Administration is conducting a holistic assessment of these dangerous drugs. Such a review is long overdue, especially in light of incomplete adverse event data that has corrupted decision-making to weaken safety protections over the years.

In the meantime, the FDA should do the bare minimum and restore the safety requirements that were in place during Trump’s first term, including in-person visits to rule out dangerous complications. Thanks to Biden, abortion pills can now be obtained online with little more than a few clicks of a mouse, stripping away basic safeguards such as knowing how far along a woman actually is in her pregnancy, whether or not she has a life-threatening ectopic pregnancy, or if the person ordering pills is even a pregnant woman at all.

This status quo is unacceptable, and returning to pre-Biden rules does not require a full-scale safety review. It would simply restore basic safeguards while the FDA tackles the broader concerns about mifepristone’s many safety concerns.

During Trump’s first term, the administration and Congress made significant pro-life policy progress. Now is the time to restore and expand on what Biden and his pro-abortion allies spent four years undoing.


(Originally published by the Daily Signal)

Filed Under: In the News

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 15
  • Go to Next Page »
#WHYWEMARCH
| Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | ©2026 March For Life
DESIGNED BY FUZATI